Can we Observe the Same Categories of Connection Designs Certainly People that people Observe One of People?

Can we Observe the Same Categories of Connection Designs Certainly People that people Observe One of People?

Hazan and you will Shaver (1987) developed a straightforward questionnaire determine these individual distinctions. (Such personal variations are named connection appearances, accessory patterns, attachment orientations, otherwise differences in the company of the attachment system.) Simply speaking, Hazan and you can Shaver expected research subjects to read through the three sentences the following, and you may imply and this part better recognized how they thought, getting, and you can react for the personal matchmaking:

A. I’m a little uncomfortable getting next to anyone else; I’ve found challenging to trust them totally, difficult to succeed myself to believe him or her. I am scared when people will get too close, and regularly, anyone else need me to be much more intimate than simply I feel comfy becoming.

The first research with the mature connection involved looking at the relationship ranging from private variations in adult attachment and exactly how someone think of the relationship as well as their memories for just what their matchmaking and their mothers are just like

B. I’ve found they not too difficult locate next to others and you will in the morning comfy based on them and having her or him trust me personally. I don’t value becoming quit or about some body providing too alongside myself.

Although this scale served due to the fact a helpful answer to studies the latest relationship between attachment styles and you can relationships working, it didn’t create an entire decide to try of your own theory that same types of private distinctions present in infants could be manifest certainly people

C. I’ve found you to anybody else was reluctant to get as near as the I’d like. We usually proper care one to my partner will not fancy myself otherwise won’t have to stick with me. I wish to rating most next to my partner, hence both scares anyone out.

Based on that it around three-classification measure, Hazan and you will Razor found that the fresh shipment away from categories is actually equivalent to that seen in infancy. Put differently, throughout the 60% out-of adults categorized themselves due to the fact safer (paragraph B), on the 20% described on their own since avoidant (section An excellent), and you will on the 20% described by themselves since the stressed-unwilling (section C).

(In many ways, this new Hazan and Razor level assumed it to be real.) Next studies have browsed which theory in lots of ways. For example, Kelly Brennan along with her acquaintances amassed numerous statements (e.grams., «I believe one anyone else would-be truth be told there for me personally while i you desire them») and you can learned ways such comments «hang along with her» statistically (Brennan, Clark, & Razor, 1998). Brennan’s results advised that there are a couple fundamental proportions with respect in order to adult accessory activities (see Figure dos). One critical variable might have been branded connection-relevant anxiety. People who rating at the top of this varying will proper care whether their lover is obtainable, responsive, attentive, etcetera. People who rating to the low end of this adjustable try safer in the detected responsiveness of its couples. Additional crucial variable is known as accessory-relevant avoidance. Some body into top of the range associated with the dimension favor to not ever rely on anyone else or start to help you anyone else. Anyone to the lowest end for the dimension be more comfy getting intimate with individuals as they are safer depending on and you can which have someone else depend upon them. A great prototypical safer mature try reasonable toward these dimensions.

Brennan’s findings is actually critical due to the fact previous analyses of your own analytical patterning regarding conclusion certainly one of kids regarding the strange condition reveal two functionally equivalent dimensions: the one that grabs variability about stress and you can resistance of your own boy and something you to definitely captures variability regarding the child’s readiness so you can utilize the father or mother while the a safe sanctuary to have support (pick Fraley & Spieker, 2003a, 2003b). Functionally, such size is just like the a couple of-proportions exposed one of adults, suggesting one similar patterns away from connection can be found at the various other activities inside the the life.

Deja un comentario